Did the Baltimore Ravens really not want to tackle the Pittsburgh Steelers' running backs? That's the bold claim coming straight from Steelers center Zach Frazier after their Week 18 showdown. It's a statement that adds fuel to the fire of an already intense rivalry!
In a hard-fought AFC North clash, the Steelers emerged victorious against the Ravens. Frazier, speaking to reporters after the game, gave credit to the Steelers' rushing attack, specifically highlighting the impact of running back Jaylen Warren. He suggested that the Ravens' defense was hesitant to engage in tackles against Warren, due to his physical running style.
"They did not want to tackle him," Frazier stated, as reported by Nick Farabaugh of Penn Live. "He’s a tough runner, and so is [Kenneth Gainwell]. You love to see them break tackles. As an offensive lineman, it fires you up.”
During the Week 18 win, Warren amassed 66 rushing yards on 14 carries. The wear and tear on the Ravens' defense was evident as they struggled to bring him down. This performance has earned Warren a spot on the list of Week 18's biggest winners.
Warren is expected to continue his strong performance against the Houston Texans on January 12, when the Steelers host their first playoff game since the 2020 season.
But here's where it gets controversial... Could Frazier's statement be a bit of gamesmanship, or is there truth to the idea that the Ravens were avoiding contact? And this is the part most people miss... Was the Ravens' defense truly intimidated, or were there other factors at play, such as strategic defensive positioning or fatigue?
What do you think? Did you see a reluctance to tackle, or is this just part of the narrative? Share your thoughts in the comments!
